A poet is, before anything else, a person who is passionately in love with language. W. H Auden
I do not consider myself a poet. I do however read poetry. I analyze poetry. I do not make chocolate, neither do I plant roses in gardens. But a good rose, and a good piece of chocolate, I will tell. But you do realize that it will only be my opinion at the end of the day. Some people do love their chocolate with cocoa, others love their roses red. I love my chocolate white, and I harbor negative, thorny feelings towards roses.
Of contemporary poetry, prose…..art.
I have had an unending debate with Tom Odhiambo and the likes of Neema Mawiyoo at the AMKA monthly reading forum. I have however lost track of where each one of us stands on the issue of contemporary literature-because we only go round in circles with our discussion from month to month. At one time I remember, we were at conflict, trying to decide whether there is a party of literature going on; where for you to secure a pass at the door, your words have to match those of Chimamanda Andichie, Ngugi wa Thiongo and T. S Elliot. I remember during the discussion, one writer shot up in response, saying that a writer writes about what they are familiar with” You cannot tell me to write about a traditional African Society where women walk around with naked dangling breasts, pots perfectly balanced on their heads. I will write about bashes and prostitutes, traffic jam and coffee dates’. I do agree with her, Literature is of course the reflection of a society.
However, my problem is not and will never be what we write about. It is how we write it. There has been a longstanding battle between generations of writers. There is a new wave preaching freedom in art…and that art is owned by the writer, it has no prescribed rules. I too have preached this gospel. I do laud the open mic events that have given us an opportunity to embrace art seeing that we rarely buy books. I have attended many of these events, and must say; Nairobi has talent.
So why I am not seeing copies on poetry and prose on the bookshop counters? Is it really because Kwani, Story Moja and other publishers are only interested in art that follows the ‘rules’? Art that follows the steps of Ngugi wa Thoing’o? Why am I not seeing a poetry reviews on our local poets by the dailies? Have they sidelined us? Or have we honestly failed?
Having thought about this for quite some time now, I’d say that we have failed…Face down. As writers, we have decided to take this issue of free art a little too far. We have forgotten the foundation of Literature and decided to take the higher floors on the building; completely ignoring facts on what qualifies a good poem, a great short story, and what doesn’t. I do know that the obvious response to this will be that people are different, and every poet or prose writer has their own style. However, we need to realize when we write, we do so to be read, not to feel good about our writing. So we need to decide the qualifications through the eyes of the reader. As long as we have put it in paper, as long as we have uttered those words into the mic, there is need to realize that at the other end, is a reader, a listener eagerly waiting to hear, to read a beautiful piece of art. We have unfortunately refused to revamp our art; just selectively put a little make up on it in the name of rhyme, and completely thrown out of the window the other elements that make literature.
We have turned prose into poetry and poetry into prose. We have invited the words ‘therefore, unfortunately, because ‘into poetry. It is like we lift that pen when writing a poem, and at the fore of our mind is how to make the unwritten piece flow musically with loads and loads of rhyme in it, forgetting that there are other elements. We have changed the description of poetry into ‘a collection of words that have homophonic syllables’. Jean Cocteau says that “A true poet does not bother to be poetical. Nor does a nursery gardener scent his roses”. I totally do not agree. A gardener does strive to produce a good quality of roses. When will I ever comment on an oxymoron element in a poem from my favorite poet in Nairobi? When will they use our poems and stories in schools to explain the meaning of a hyperbole? I want to see someone referring to a poetry book from one of the spoken word artistes as blockbuster, a must read, not because all the poems rhyme, but because it contains beautiful art-that which is made beautiful by complex and numerous elements that have been employed.
Yes there is a difference between performed art and that which is written. However, I know many of us wake up with a dream of being published every day; whether you perform your art, or you let them read it. What stands as the cutting line here is whether your performed piece has a backbone that is strong enough to make it through in print as it is the case in performance.
Sometimes I think even the event organizers for open mic need to consider moving them away from the noise. A lover of poetry will most definitely not want to struggle to hear the words through a noisy mess of drunks. Words make literature. They are the backbones. It does not just involve picking up words here and there to tell a story. It has to be beautiful.
“Poetry is ordinary language raised to the Nth power. Poetry is boned with ideas, nerved and blooded with emotions, all held together by the delicate, tough skin of words. “- Paul Engle.
Anyone can weave a blanket of a piece by putting words together. A therefore after a full stop. An interjection here and there. But as artists we need to realize that these rules; the ones we were taught by Mr. Nanio in form 3, they still are relevant. We can fight all we want, create boundaries between contemporary literature and; traditional literature’; call them two different schools, but the cutting line is the reader. She and he is the connection between the two of us. Will they find our art beautiful, will they remember it for its complexity that is simply beautiful, or will they watch us perform, rhyme every word- forget it and go back home, waiting to hear another piece in another open mic event?
I do not know if my ramblings are making sense to any writer out there, but I need to be able to use a poem by Wanjiku Mwaurah, Edwin Baru , Kevin Waithaka, Checkmate… I need to be able to use a poem by these poets to analyze in class with my students. We do want to change the perception in schools that poetry is difficult, don’t we? We need to get our short stories out there for institutions to use as resources. But how shall we do that if we do not write pieces that have something to analyze? I hear someone once said that you cannot play tennis without a net. When I want to give an example of irony, will I find it in one of your poems? Will my students read your poem, enjoy and find reason to analyze it? Or will they just read it as one of those history textbooks?
As you come to then of 2010, think about your art. Let us make 2011 ours….
Chimamanda Andichie and Ngugi wa Thiongo do not decide who gets into this party. The reader does… so is the reader reading our works?






Thought provoking…very thought provoking…
I have never thought of my work in that way! If someone were to take a poem I wrote and analyze it, academicaly. Looking for a theme, stylistic devices or a societal context, where would it stand?
Thanks Jaqcue for the challenge.
I love your latest poem… Be Humble…
…. In other news, I do believe that there are so many poets that have mad talent in Nairobi and they haven’t received as much attention from the obvious parties as they should. I have ever analyzed a poem by Wanjiku with my students when I was teaching literature and I must say that it was the most interesting lesson in my short teaching career… The poem made a lot of sense to them…. . . .
Keep them beautiful…mind us, your reader and listeners..
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Wanjeri Gakuru, Richard Mureithi, Edwin Baru, Jacque ndinda chirac, Wanjiku Mwaurah and others. Wanjiku Mwaurah said: RT @Jacquendinda: Have we failed?: http://t.co/B87PsyP @mawazo_mengi @edwinbaru @marcusolang @woozie_m @soul_fool @wamathai [...]
Same sentiments as Baru, it does challenge, compel one to write poetry, not merely jumble together words for the sake of ‘writing’.
I guess everything has steps…so when you get to the point where you write not just for the sake of emitting words from a creative mind, then we can say you are a writer on another level….
i must say, that i finally have a proper explanation for why i have not written in a while, especially after reading or should i just call it blog whoring. written pieces must have all these elements, proper grammar and syntax,lexical relevance and synchrony,and just a general sense of legibility. That should cover it. Notwithstanding the writer must have this gift to chain words together and the outcome having this appeal for readers to actually read enjoyably.
That being said, let it not be assumed that i am such a writer, instead i just dabble, yet i can say confidently that i do have an eye or ear for good and bogus literature. Not to come off haughty, but writers need to grow a certain keenness as regards written pieces, those that are spoken however may have a looser definition and depend completely on the wishes of the poet.,performer.
there..my 2 cents.
I believe it is ok to ‘just dabble’….some of us want to write so much and we might not be bestowed with so much complexity of syntax , lexical ish….. but even with our dabble, we need to remember the reader …. just writing plainly from year to year makes us no different from an academic writer. I think we would be plainly selfish not to ‘tweeze the eyebrows of our piece, put a little lip gloss here and there…’…. and don’t get me wrong, I am not preaching the gospel of using heavy words…just go back to the basics of stylistic devices…throw in a word that gives the creative piece context… what makes the piece kenyan? Thanks for your cents love
I would have to agree. Most recently writing has taken the tone “as long as the message is passed.” Now not to undermine the importance of the message but you know what? Sod that. It is about time us as writers(prose and poets) learned and appreciated the language and structure. I’m sick of sms poetry(see death by pen) or ‘poets’ that think poetry is nothing but a rhyming competition. It isn’t. Rhyme is a remarkable part of poetry but it isnt all that makes a poem. Where did onomatopoeia, alliteration, assonance, dissonance, to mention but a few, go? Oh well I guess we have failed haven’t we? But let us not use the term fail but stumbled. I believe we can go back to emulating Poe, Kipling, Barlow, Standa, Bitek, Nash and the like all we have to do is style up.I will stop typing now. Thanks for opening this box Jackie. Cool piece.
Yeah I read ‘death by a pen’… a friend of mine calls what you talked about literally laziness…. ( by the way, shortening words is a style…but I don’t think id find beauty in that sms language …st8ght…noooo!!!)… I agree, we haven’t failed…that would be denying us credit we deserve…we have just taken a different path , a wrong one in this case….
Yes Jacque! And even if the ‘literature’ got published and some read it, the lack of essentials would mean it would never make it globally. Hurray to more effort and truly professional writing!
and then you reminded me something else… globalism … If we are targeting a distance further than our desk, I guess we need to put in mind that global literature market has a keener eye…. We shouldn’t copy existing authors, that would be too unrealistic… Just put a signature in your writing style and make it beautiful for the reader.. that is all
I felt like I was being reproached.
None-the-less it is quite a potent piece, debatable to some degree (at least to the extent to which I can justify my short-comings), but true for the most part, however much it hurts.
I envy your students.
then you left me wanting to hear you justify that which you call your ‘short-comings’….
The debatable parts…kindly indulge me..I might learn seventeen or five things from it…
[...] Contemporary. Have we failed? Ah well. I am passionate about literature, writing. It is what I studied in school. Whenever people sit down to talk writing, my eyes open up and start looking for husbands in the panel. That is how close to the heart literature resides. But this post, well, I don’t know. The hits were good yes, but I expected more discussion on it… [...]